10 proposed measures
- Develop a new Organic Housing Law, because owners are afraid to rent out and investors – to buy.
- Adopt Article 544 bis of the Criminal Procedure Law so that the eviction of “okupas” is authorized by the on-duty judge and carried out immediately.
- Classify illegal occupation as a criminal offense (fraud) and prosecute under Article 250.1 of the Criminal Code, including those who draw up fake rental contracts.
- Staying in a property after the end of a holiday rental should also be considered fraud, reflected in the same Article 250.1.
- Vulnerability cannot be grounds to suspend the eviction of “okupas”, who must also pay for electricity, water, property tax, mortgage and other expenses.
- Amend Article 9 of the Housing Law, which does not provide legal consequences for non-compliance.
- Introduce a registry of rental debtors, the development of which should have started back in 2013.
- Qualify the submission of fake rental contracts as procedural fraud.
- Define the term “flagrante delicto” so the police can act without fear of losing their jobs and carry out evictions within 24 hours.
- Grant homeowners’ associations the right to initiate criminal proceedings against “okupas”.
Judge Magro’s position
As Judge Magro stated, the need for housing cannot be a reason or justification for the illegal occupation of another citizen’s property: “Responsibility for social housing lies with the public administration.”
In addition, Magro argues that the problem of illegal occupation leads owners to commit crimes as well: “The slowness of the courts and delays in returning property force owners to pay ‘okupas’ to leave their homes. This is also a crime. Thus, criminal groups are created, because there are legal incentives for illegal settlement.”


